Grade | Projects |
---|---|
0 | No public policy |
1 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for upstream projects in 1 unconventional sector. |
2 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for upstream projects in 2 unconventional sectors. |
3 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for upstream projects in 3 unconventional sectors.
OR Exclusion of insurance coverage for oil and gas field exploration projects. |
4 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for all unconventional oil and gas upstream projects.
OR Exclusion of some conventional and unconventional oil and gas projects: geographic disparities, potentially large exceptions, partial value chain, new oil OR gas fields, etc. |
5 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for all unconventional oil and gas upstream and midstream projects. |
6 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for upstream oil OR gas projects. |
7 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for new oil and gas fields. |
8 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for oil and gas upstream projects.
OR Exclusion of insurance coverage for new oil and gas fields and some midstream projects. |
9 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for oil and gas upstream projects and some midstream projects. |
10 | Exclusion of insurance coverage for oil and gas upstream projects and all midstream projects. |
Bonus & Penalties
- [Unconventional] Bonus +1 if midstream projects (infrastructure exclusively or mostly dedicated to unconventional) are excluded.
- [Unconventional] Bonus +1 when the definition of unconventional sectors is complete according to Urgewald’s Global Oil & Gas Exit List. Excluding oil and gas extraction located in the Amazon can also be considered.
- Bonus +1 when some downstream projects (fossil fuel-fired power plants, refineries, petrochemical projects, etc.) are excluded.
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1 when the exclusion of unconventional projects is linked to the company’s involvement in oil and gas activities (1).
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1 when the exclusion is limited by a restrictive definition of the unconventional sector (e.g. limited/no definition of the Arctic region, offshore or onshore, oil or gas, etc.).
- Penalty -1 when the definition of “new oil & gas field” is much more restrictive than “any oil & gas field not yet in production” (2).
- Penalty -1 when exceptions are minimal, -2 when exceptions are significant.
- Penalties do not apply below score 1.
- The total penalties in a sector cannot exceed the number of points earned by the financial institution regarding this specific sector.
- Example: exclusion of financial services dedicated to oil and gas projects carried out by companies deriving more than X% of their production from the Arctic region.
- A (re)insurer will not be penalized if it defines “new oil & gas fields” as “any fields approved for development after December 31st, 2021”, as the definition is aligned to the IEA”s recommendation. However, a financial institution will be penalized if its definition of “new oil & gas fields” is very restrictive, e.g. any oil & gas field that received its Final Investment Decision after December 31st, 2022.
Remarks
Our assessment considers the following 4 unconventional sectors: Arctic oil & gas, shale oil & gas, tar sands, ultra-deep water oil & gas activities. The OGPT will also consider as a bonus a broader definition of unconventional oil & gas, as specified in the Global Oil & Gas Exit List: Arctic oil & gas, shale oil & gas, tar sands, ultra-deep water oil & gas, coalbed methane and extra-heavy oil. Excluding oil & gas extraction located in the Amazon can also be considered.
We define upstream oil & gas projects as:
- Oil & gas exploration;
- Development of a new oil & gas field*;
- Expansion or redevelopment of any field.
We define midstream oil & gas projects as:
- Infrastructure directly related to new oil & gas fields*;
- Any new LNG infrastructure;
- Capacity increase of existing infrastructure.
*New oil & gas fields which are not producing yet
For this criterion, we consider the following insurance products:
- Standalone or single-site coverage for insurers
- Facultative reinsurance and direct insurance for reinsurers
We mainly consider the following risk:
Engineering Lines (Construction All Risk – CAR or Erection All Risk – EAR)”
Grade | EXPANSION COMPANIES |
---|---|
0 | No public policy. |
1 | When assessing companies, “oil and gas expansion” is a criterion that can lead to undefined sanctions. |
2 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas projects, but no timeline specified or only applied to new clients/new risks. |
3 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas projects, but weak coverage of the O&G industry (exceptions, 1 unconventional sector, etc.) by the end of 2023.
OR Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas projects, but applied between 2026 and 2030. |
4 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas upstream projects in some unconventional sectors by the end of 2023.
OR Conditions insurance of existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas upstream projects by the end of 2025, with exceptions for some undefined companies. |
5 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of unconventional oil & gas upstream projects by the end of 2023. |
6 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas upstream projects by the end of 2025. |
7 | Conditions insurance dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of oil & gas upstream projects by the end of 2024. |
8 | Conditions all insurance coverage to the end of oil & gas upstream projects by the end of 2023.
OR Conditions all insurance coverage to the end of oil & gas upstream and midstream projects by the end of 2025. |
9 | Conditions all insurance coverage to the end of oil & gas upstream and midstream projects by the end of 2024. |
10 | Conditions all insurance coverage to the end of oil & gas upstream and midstream projects by the end of 2023. |
Bonus & penalties
- Bonus +1 the end of some downstream expansion (fossil fuel-fired power plants, refineries) is a request leading to financing sanctions.
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1/2 if commitment only applied by 2024/2025.
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1 when the definition of the unconventional sector is restrictive (e.g. limited/no definition of the Arctic region, offshore or onshore, oil or gas, etc.).
- [For scores between 1 and 8] Penalty -2 if commitment only applies to oil or gas.
- Penalty -1 when a delimited number of companies benefit from an exception.
- Penalty -1 when the deadline considered for the Final Investment Decision of new oil & gas upstream projects is set at a later date than December 31st, 2021.
- Penalty -1 when a commitment only applies to some oil and gas upstream expansion plans or to oil and gas upstream and some midstream expansion plans.
- Penalty -1 when the policy does not apply to all the lines of business* of/all risks covered by the insurer.
- [For reinsurers/insurers with reinsurance activities] Penalty -1 when the restrictions do not apply to reinsurance treaties.
- “Penalties do not apply below score 1.
- The total penalties in a sector cannot exceed the number of points earned by the financial institution regarding this specific sector.
Remarks
We recommend that exclusion policies targeting companies expanding their oil & gas production be based on the Global Oil & Gas Exit List (GOGEL), and especially on the short-term expansion metric relying on resources under development and field evaluation (in mmboe) per company. This metric allows financial institutions to identify oil and/or gas resources that will come into production in the near future.
For reinsurers: Exclusion of transferred risks from the ceding insurer for treaty reinsurance when the ultimate insured company has oil and gas upstream / and midstream expansion plans.
*By all lines of business, we refer to:
- P&C (Property & Casualty)
- Engineering Lines (Construction All Risk – CAR)
- Surety bonds
Grade | PHASE OUT |
---|---|
0 | No policy. |
1 | “Oil and gas production plan” is a criterion that can lead to undefined sanctions.
OR The financial institution has adopted weak*** 2030 targets for the oil & gas industry. |
2 | Unsystematic but defined sanctions for companies that do not immediately commit to reduce their oil and gas production.
OR The financial institution has adopted comprehensive*** 2030 targets for the oil & gas industry. |
3 | The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for oil and gas upstream activities by 2050.
OR The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for unconventional oil and gas activities by 2030. OR Unsystematic but defined sanctions for companies that do not immediately commit to reduce their oil and gas production by 2030. |
4 | The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for oil & gas upstream activities by 2050. AND Unsystematic but defined sanctions for companies that do not immediately commit to reduce their oil & gas production
OR The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for unconventional oil and gas activities by 2030. AND In the short term, conditions insurance coverage dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to an immediate commitment to reduce unconventional oil & gas production by 2030. |
5 | The financial institution has announced a phase-out date for oil & gas upstream activities by 2050.
AND Unsystematic but defined sanctions for companies that do not immediately commit to reduce their oil & gas production by 2030. |
6 | The financial institution has announced a phase-out date for oil & gas upstream activities by 2050.
AND Unsystematic but defined sanctions for companies that do not immediately commit to reduce their oil & gas production by 2030, aligned with a 1.5°C scenario with no or low overshoot and low reliance on negative emissions*. OR In the short term, condition insurance coverage dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to an immediate commitment to reduce both oil & gas production by 2030. |
7 | The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for oil and gas upstream activities by 2050.
AND In the short term, condition insurance coverage of existing oil and gas assets to an immediate commitment to reduce both oil & gas production by 2030. |
8 | In the short term, condition insurance coverage dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to an immediate commitment to reduce both oil & gas production by 2030, aligned with a 1.5°C scenario with no or low overshoot and low reliance on negative emissions*. |
9 | The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for oil and gas upstream activities by 2050.
AND In the short term, condition all insurance coverage to an immediate commitment to reduce both oil & gas production by 2030, aligned with a 1.5°C scenario with no or low overshoot and low reliance on negative emissions and low reliance on negative emissions*. |
10 | The financial institution has adopted a phase-out date for oil and gas upstream and midstream activities by 2050.
AND In the short term, condition all insurance coverage to an immediate commitment to reduce both oil & gas production by 2030, aligned with a 1.5°C scenario with no or low overshoot and low reliance on negative emissions**. |
Bonus & penalties
- Bonus +1/2 if additional commitment to phase out oil and gas-fired power generation activities by 2040 worldwide/and by 2035 in OECD and European countries.
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1 if phase-out commitment for unconventional sectors applies between 2031 and 2040.
- [Unconventional] Penalty -1 if phase-out commitment only covers a few unconventional sectors.
- [For scores between 1 and 8] Penalty -2 if commitment only applies to oil or gas.
- Penalty -1 when exceptions are minimal, -2 when exceptions are significant.
- Penalty -2 if standalone insurance coverage/direct insurance/facultative reinsurance of oil or gas projects is still allowed.
- Penalty -1 if the commitment does not apply to all lines of business****.
- [For reinsurers/insurers with reinsurance activities] Penalty -1 when the restrictions do not apply to reinsurance treaties.
- Penalties do not apply below score 1.
- The total penalties in a sector cannot exceed the number of points earned by the financial institution regarding this specific sector.
Remarks
*the company has committed :
– not to develop new oil and gas upstream projects;
OR
– if developing new oil & gas assets, closing existing oil & gas assets in order to stay in a 1.5°C pathway: closing assets should total an equivalent amount of resources and, if possible, a similar production profile as developing assets. Sold assets must not be considered when assessing oil & gas production reduction aligned with a 1.5°C scenario.”
**the company has committed:
– not to develop new oil and gas upstream and midstream projects;
OR
– if developing new oil & gas assets, closing existing oil & gas assets in order to stay in a 1.5°C pathway: closing assets should total an equivalent amount of resources and, if possible, a similar production profile as developing assets. Sold assets must not be considered when assessing oil & gas production reduction aligned with a 1.5°C scenario.
***Weak targets are absolute or intensity targets with some of the following criteria:
- scope 1, 2 and 3 covered;
- at least upstream activities covered. We recommend the financial institution to cover both upstream and midstream activities;
- at least a target based on CO2 measurements. We recommend the financial institution to present separate targets for CO2 and methane;
- ambitious reduction targets, with goals for 2030 reduction that are almost aligned with the global figures set in the IEA’s net zero scenario.
***Comprehensive oil & gas targets are:
- absolute targets;
- scope 1, 2 and 3 covered;
- at least upstream activities covered. We recommend the financial institution to cover both upstream and midstream activities;
- at least a target based on CO2 equivalent measurements. We recommend the financial institution to present separate targets for CO2 and methane;
- ambitious reduction targets, with goals for 2030 reduction that are aligned with the global figures set in the IEA’s net zero scenario.
Very weak targets do not allow to score points.
A phase-out for unconventional sectors after 2040 is not considered.
Reclaim Finance reserves the right to equate a long-term commitment with the adoption of robust relative and/or absolute thresholds in the short term.
- Unconventional thresholds considered as phase-out: a relative threshold of 5% based on a production metric or an absolute threshold of 2 mmboe.
- Conventional oil & gas upstream thresholds considered as phase-out: an absolute threshold of 20 mmboe.
- Conventional oil & gas upstream & midstream thresholds: a relative threshold of 5% fossil fuel share of revenues.
****By all lines of business, we refer to:
- P&C (Property & Casualty)
- Engineering Lines (Construction All Risk – CAR)
- Surety bonds
Reclaim Finance reserves the right to equate a phase-out applied to the financial institution itself with the request for a phase-out to financed companies. The request for a phase-out strategy to the company must be done within a well-defined framework (well-defined duration of engagement, restriction of financing in case of engagement failure). If the exclusion does not apply within 3 years, then a penalty -1 will be applied.
Grade | UNCONVENTIONAL SECTOR POLICY |
---|---|
![]() |
No policy. |
![]() |
Weak commitments against this unconventional sector: very partial exclusion of the sector, weak engagement commitments, etc. |
![]() |
One of the following criteria:
|
![]() |
Conditions insurance coverage dedicated to existing oil and gas assets to the end of new unconventional oil and gas projects.*
OR Exclusion of insurance coverage for upstream and midstream projects in this unconventional sector AND Two of the following criteria:
[Arctic] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of the Arctic area: AMAP definition or another definition covering at least 75% of the AMAP region. [Ultradeep water] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of “ultradeep”: offshore wells below 1500 meters. [Extra-heavy oil] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of “extra-heavy oil”: oil with API gravity < 15°. |
![]() |
Three criteria:
[Arctic] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of the Arctic area: AMAP definition or equivalent in terms of geographical coverage. [Ultradeep water] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of “ultradeep”: offshore wells below 1500 meters. [Extra-heavy oil] Adoption of an exhaustive definition of “extra-heavy oil”: oil with API gravity < 15°. |
Bonus & penalties
Penalties of projects, expansion and phase-out criteria will be taken into account and could lead to the downgrading of the financial institution in the concerned sector.
Remarks
*This criterion does not apply to one unconventional sector, but to a complete definition of the unconventional sectors (shale oil & gas, tar sands, Arctic oil & gas, ultra-deep water oil & gas, extra-heavy oil, coalbed methane).
When scoring commitments against Arctic oil & gas activities, the definition of the region is considered. Reclaim Finance recommends the Arctic Monitoring Assessment Programme’s (AMAP) definition. This definition of the area is based on environmental and climate factors.
Reclaim Finance reserves the right to equate the above relative thresholds with other equivalent relative or absolute thresholds.